IS THERE A "GARBAGE PATCH"?
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY MEDIA RELEASE
OREGONIAN ARTICLE
PLASTIC IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN
HOME
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
PAPER BAGS AND CO2
PAPER BAGS IN LANDFILLS
THE TRUTH ABOUT LITTER
THE FAMOUS TURTLE PICTURE
"SERIES OF BLUNDERS" ARTICLE
IS THERE A "GARBAGE PATCH"?
THE VOYAGE OF THE "JUNK"
THE OIL MYTH
PLASTIC BAG RECYCLING BINS
REUSABLE BAGS ARE UNSANITARY
LITIGATION
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
Welcome to NuWorld
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY MEDIA RELEASE

OCEANIC “GARBAGE PATCH” NOT NEARLY AS BIG AS PORTRAYED IN MEDIA

1-4-11

CORVALLIS, Ore. – There is a lot of plastic trash floating in the Pacific Ocean, but claims that the “Great Garbage Patch” between California and Japan is twice the size of Texas are grossly exaggerated, according to an analysis by an Oregon State University scientist.

Further claims that the oceans are filled with more plastic than plankton, and that the patch has been growing tenfold each decade since the 1950s are equally misleading, pointed out Angelicque “Angel” White, an assistant professor of oceanography at Oregon State.

“There is no doubt that the amount of plastic in the world’s oceans is troubling, but this kind of exaggeration undermines the credibility of scientists,” White said. “We have data that allow us to make reasonable estimates; we don’t need the hyperbole. Given the observed concentration of plastic in the North Pacific, it is simply inaccurate to state that plastic outweighs plankton, or that we have observed an exponential increase in plastic.”

White has pored over published literature and participated in one of the few expeditions solely aimed at understanding the abundance of plastic debris and the associated impact of plastic on microbial communities. That expedition was part of research funded by the National Science Foundation through C-MORE, the Center for Microbial Oceanography: Research and Education.

The studies have shown is that if you look at the actual area of the plastic itself, rather than the entire North Pacific subtropical gyre, the hypothetically “cohesive” plastic patch is actually less than 1 percent of the geographic size of Texas.

“The amount of plastic out there isn’t trivial,” White said. “But using the highest concentrations ever reported by scientists produces a patch that is a small fraction of the state of Texas, not twice the size.”

Another way to look at it, White said, is to compare the amount of plastic found to the amount of water in which it was found. “If we were to filter the surface area of the ocean equivalent to a football field in waters having the highest concentration (of plastic) ever recorded,” she said, “the amount of plastic recovered would not even extend to the 1-inch line.”

Recent research by scientists at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution found that the amount of plastic, at least in the Atlantic Ocean, hasn’t increased since the mid-1980s – despite greater production and consumption of materials made from plastic, she pointed out.

“Are we doing a better job of preventing plastics from getting into the ocean?” White said. “Is more plastic sinking out of the surface waters? Or is it being more efficiently broken down? We just don’t know. But the data on hand simply do not suggest that ‘plastic patches’ have increased in size. This is certainly an unexpected conclusion, but it may in part reflect the high spatial and temporal variability of plastic concentrations in the ocean and the limited number of samples that have been collected.”

The hyperbole about plastic patches saturating the media rankles White, who says such exaggeration can drive a wedge between the public and the scientific community. One recent claim that the garbage patch is as deep as the Golden Gate Bridge is tall is completely unfounded, she said.

“Most plastics either sink or float,” White pointed out. “Plastic isn’t likely to be evenly distributed through the top 100 feet of the water column.”

White says there is growing interest in removing plastic from the ocean, but such efforts will be costly, inefficient, and may have unforeseen consequences. It would be difficult, for example, to “corral” and remove plastic particles from ocean waters without inadvertently removing phytoplankton, zooplankton, and small surface-dwelling aquatic creatures.

“These small organisms are the heartbeat of the ocean,” she said. “They are the foundation of healthy ocean food chains and immensely more abundant than plastic debris.”

The relationship between microbes and plastic is what drew White and her C-MORE colleagues to their analysis in the first place. During a recent expedition, they discovered that photosynthetic microbes were thriving on many plastic particles, in essence confirming that plastic is prime real estate for certain microbes.

White also noted that while plastic may be beneficial to some organisms, it can also be toxic. Specifically, it is well-known that plastic debris can adsorb toxins such as PCB.

“On one hand, these plastics may help remove toxins from the water,” she said. “On the other hand, these same toxin-laden particles may be ingested by fish and seabirds. Plastic clearly does not belong in the ocean.”

Among other findings, which White believes should be part of the public dialogue on ocean trash:

  • Calculations show that the amount of energy it would take to remove plastics from the ocean is roughly 250 times the mass of the plastic itself;
  • Plastic also covers the ocean floor, particularly offshore of large population centers. A recent survey from the state of California found that 3 percent of the southern California Bight’s ocean floor was covered with plastic – roughly half the amount of ocean floor covered by lost fishing gear in the same location. But little, overall, is known about how much plastic has accumulated at the bottom of the ocean, and how far offshore this debris field extends;
  • It is a common misperception that you can see or quantify plastic from space. There are no tropical plastic islands out there and, in fact, most of the plastic isn’t even visible from the deck of a boat;
  • There are areas of the ocean largely unpolluted by plastic. A recent trawl White conducted in a remote section of water between Easter Island and Chile pulled in no plastic at all.

There are other issues with plastic, White said, including the possibility that floating debris may act as a vector for introducing invasive species into sensitive habitats.

“If there is a takeaway message, it’s that we should consider it good news that the ‘garbage patch’ doesn’t seem to be as bad as advertised,” White said, “but since it would be prohibitively costly to remove the plastic, we need to focus our efforts on preventing more trash from fouling our oceans in the first place.”

About the OSU College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences: COAS is internationally recognized for its faculty, research and facilities, including state-of-the-art computing infrastructure to support real-time ocean/atmosphere observation and prediction. The college is a leader in the study of the Earth as an integrated system, providing scientific understanding to address complex environmental challenges

http://oregonstate.edu/ua/ncs/archives/2011/jan/oceanic-“garbage-patch”-not-nearly-big-portrayed-media



  Back to top
OREGONIAN ARTICLE

Reports of Pacific Ocean's plastic patch being Texas-sized are grossly exaggerated, Oregon State University professor says

Published: Tuesday, January 04, 2011, 8:11 PM     Updated: Thursday, January 06, 2011, 9:48 AM
Scott Learn, The Oregonian By Scott Learn, The Oregonian 
ocean.mess._9.JPGSCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHYThere's plenty of trash in the Pacific Ocean, plastic and otherwise. But an Oregon State University professor says the extent of the problem is "grossly exaggerated."
Remember that Great Pacific Garbage Patch, the pile of floating plastic and other debris "twice the size of Texas" or more? 

Now comes Oregon State University assistant professor Angelicque "Angel" White to say that estimate is "grossly exaggerated." 

White, who participated in a 2008 scientific expedition to survey plastic debris, figures the size of a hypothetically cohesive Pacific plastic "patch" is actually less than 1 percent the geographic size of Texas. 

What's more, the oceanography professor says the data suggest that plastic contamination hasn't increased dramatically -- or perhaps not at all -- in recent decades, despite greater use of plastic. 

There's definitely too much plastic in the ocean -- it "doesn't belong there," White says, and many varieties degrade slowly. 

But the hyperbole about the problem undermines scientific credibility, she says, and drives a wedge between the public and scientists. 

Media references to a Texas-plus sized patch of debris and plastic "islands" have been far-ranging in recent years, from Oprah to the Russian newspaper Pravda to a plastic cleanup article by a certain environmental reporter at The Oregonian (mea culpa). 

White said she saw firsthand on an expedition funded by the National Science Foundation that "the word picture that's been painted is unrealistic." 

The contamination is dispersed in the water, typically beneath the surface. Her estimate, she says, uses the highest plastic concentrations in ocean water ever reported by scientists. 

"I had heard 'twice the size of Texas,' '300 feet deep,' the scariest thing Oprah had ever seen, and then you go out there and you don't see it," White says. "Plastic in the ocean is not a good thing, but it's not as bad as it's being portrayed." 

Claims that the ocean has more plastic than plankton or that the patch has grown tenfold each decade since the 1950s are equally misleading, White says. 

The expedition found that photosynthetic microbes such as algae were thriving on many tiny plastic particles, and plastic can absorb some toxins. 

But those same toxin-laden particles can be eaten by fish and seabirds, entering the food chain. And birds and marine mammals are drawn to eat larger pieces of bright plastic, which can harm them, White says. 

The Algalita Marine Research Foudation in California, founded by sea captain Charles Moore, first spotlighted the ocean pollution. After a 1999 expedition, it reported a garbage patch of mostly plastic that could be the size of Texas, Executive Director Marieta Francis says. 

Foundation expeditions have since found plastic in ocean samples out to the international date line, Francis says, showing that the extent of contamination is actually much larger than first estimated. 

But "it's not really a patch," Francis agreed. 

"Unfortunately, we were kind of responsible for some of that at first," she says. "It gives the general public a visual, but it also gives people a (false) impression of a solid mat that we could go clean up." 

Oregon's Legislature will consider a ban on plastic checkout bags this year, backed by grocers, paper bag makers and environmental groups, including the Oregon chapter of the Surfrider Foundation. 

Gus Gates, Surfrider's Oregon policy coordinator, says he tries to avoid the Texas comparison. 

But beach and river cleanups find plenty of plastic trash, Gates says, from bags to water bottles to fishing gear to polystyrene foam. 

When heavy winds broke up the North Pacific gyre of rotating ocean currents last spring, he says, "We saw a huge volume of trash washing up on our beaches." 

As a scientist, White says she sticks to "conceptualizing the problem in a way that makes sense to me." 

As an Oregonian, she chooses to use cloth bags. 

"I think this is actually a hopeful story," she says. "If we stop using so much plastic and wasting it now, we can make sure we don't have any plastic islands in the future." 

-- Scott Learn

http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2011/01/reports_of_pacific_oceans_plas_1.html
  Back to top
PLASTIC IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

The Sea Education Association based in Woods Hole, Massachusetts (which is not affiliated with the plastic industry in any way) has surveyed plastic debris in the Atlantic Ocean for the past 22 years. They are now reporting that the concentration of plastic in the Atlantic Ocean has not increased over the past 22 years, despite the increased production of plastics during that period. They were surprised to find that there was no overall change in the amount of plastic snared from 1986 to 2008. 
Karen Lavender, an oceanographer at the Sea Education Association said: 
"I expected to see the line go right up. It took us a good year to decide no, we have not seen an increase, no matter how you slice it." 
Each half-hour trawl in the area where the concentration was the highest typically turned up just 20 tiny pieces, equivalent to about 0.3 grams in all. By comparison, a U.S. nickel weighs 5 grams. 
Click here and here to read about the Sea Education Association's findings.
We acknowledge that a plastic bag was photographed in the Atlantic Ocean, near to the location of the Titanic. Click here for the article.
  Back to top
Site By Spirit © 2008-12 Save The Plastic Bag Coalition. All rights reserved.